|  
  
 Patients Concerned About Insurer InfluencesData Bulletin No. 17June 2000
 J. Lee Hargraves
  egislative efforts to regulate managed
    care reflect, in part, consumer concerns about how health plans influence doctor-patient
    relationships. Recent findings by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) show
    that many consumers believe that their doctors are influenced by insurers (see Figure 1). However, they trust that their own doctor puts their
    medical needs first.
 Specifically, results from the 1998-1999 Community Tracking Study (CTS) Household
    Survey show that 44 percent of adults with public or private insurance who had a doctor
    visit in the past 12 months or had a doctor as a usual source of care agreed with the
    following statement, "I think my doctor is strongly influenced by health insurance
    company rules when making decisions about my medical care." This percentage remained
    stable between 1996-1997 and 1998-1999, a noteworthy finding given the managed care
    backlash.  At the same time, relatively few people, about 7 percent in the 1998-1999 survey, think
    that doctors fail to put patients needs first. Among those who felt that insurers
    influence their doctors, this is also true, but to a slightly higher degree (12 percent).    FIGURE 1CONSUMERS TRUST IN THEIR DOCTOR
 
        Source: Community Tracking Study
    Household Survey, 1998-1999     Demographic DifferencesThere were significant demographic differences in peoples perceptions that doctors may
    be influenced by insurance company rules, but fewer demographic differences with respect
    to patients trust that doctors put patients medical needs first (see
    Figure 2). These patterns changed little between the two surveys.  FIGURE 2CONSUMERS TRUST IN THEIR DOCTOR BY INCOME, RACE AND HEALTH STATUS
 
        Source: Community Tracking Study
    Household Survey, 1998-1999  Income. As income increases, there is a steady decline in the percentage of
    those who believe that doctors are strongly influenced by insurance company rules. For
    example, more than half of people with family incomes below the poverty line agree that
    their doctors are influenced by insurers, compared with 40 percent of those with incomes
    at least four times the poverty level. Across all income groups, the percentage of people
    who feel that doctors will not put their medical needs first in making treatment decisions
    was very low.  Race. African Americans and Hispanics were much more likely to agree that their
    doctors are influenced by insurance rules (56 percent and 54 percent, respectively),
    compared with whites (40 percent). In an analysis not shown here, these racial and ethnic
    differences remained after controlling for income and other demographic characteristics.
    Compared with whites and African Americans, Hispanics were more likely to believe that
    their doctors may not put their medical needs first when making decisions.  Health Status. People in poorer health were slightly more concerned about
    insurers influencing the decisions of their doctors. Although the differences were small,
    people who reported poorer health were more likely than those in better health to believe
    that doctors will not put medical needs above other considerations.     ImplicationsSociety needs to balance the cost savings that can be achieved by influencing doctors
    decisions about referrals, tests and treatments against concerns that insurer
    interventions may threaten the quality of care. In part to respond to this issue,
    UnitedHealthcare announced it would no longer require prior approvals for care that is
    covered. The public has an interest in how much insurers try to influence doctors, but may
    be divided on whether insurers have gone too far. The challenge for policy makers is in
    deciding whether to intervene. These decisions require reconciling consumer concern about
    insurer influence with their overwhelming confidence in their doctors.  
 This Data Bulletin presents findings from two rounds of the Household Survey, a
    nationally representative telephone survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized
    population conducted as part of the Community Tracking Study. The 1996-1997 survey
    includes nearly 33,000 families and 60,000 individuals, while the 1998-1999 survey
    includes about 32,000 families and 59,000 individuals. This analysis does not include
    people who lack health insurance. All comparisons and differences described are
    statistically significant at the p<.05 level.  |