Insurance Coverage & Costs Access to Care Uninsured and Low-Income Racial/Ethnic Disparities Safety Net Providers Community Health Centers Hospitals Physicians Insured People Quality & Care Delivery Health Care Markets Issue Briefs Data Bulletins Research Briefs Tracking Reports Policy Analyses Community Reports Journal Articles Other Publications Surveys Site Visits HSCdataOnline Design and Methods Data Files Sign Up for HSC Alerts News Media Sign Up Email This Document |
![]() Gatekeeping Arrangements in Widespread UseData Bulletin No. 07
Critics fear, however, that gatekeeping arrangements, especially when coupled with other administrative and financial incentives to reduce costs, could restrict patients access to specialists, even when such services would be beneficial. PHYSICIAN PARTICIPATION IS HIGH
On average, primary care physicians who are gatekeepers serve in this role for 4 out of every 10 of their patients. The percentage of patients in gatekeeping is higher among general pediatricians (52 percent) than general internists (40 percent) or family practitioners (39 percent).
THE FUTURE OF GATEKEEPING
Concerns voiced by patient advocacy groups and some physicians have led state and federal regulators to consider ways to ensure patients access to specialists. Florida and Georgia are the first two states to implement legislation requiring that patients be allowed to see certain specialists -- dermatologists -- without going through a gatekeeper. Several other states are considering similar action. The Center will track these and other developments that may contribute to further changes over time in the role of primary care physicians and access to specialists. This Data Bulletin presents preliminary findings from the Household and Physician Surveys conducted in 1996 and 1997 as part of the Community Tracking Study. The Household Survey is a nationally representative telephone survey of the civilian, non-institutionalized population; it included 43,771 persons in 23,554 families. The Physician Survey is a nationally representative telephone survey of non-federal, patient care physicians (excluding certain specialities -- e.g., radiology, anesthesiology, pathology); it included 9,264 physicians, of whom 5,160 are primary care physicians. All comparisons and differences described in the text are statistically significant at the p<0.05 level. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||