|  
  
 Most Medicare Outpatient Visits are to Physicians with Limited Clinical Information TechnologyData Bulletin No. 30July 2005
 Joy M. Grossman, Marie C. Reed
  doption of clinical information technology (IT) in physicians practices has the potential
to improve quality and reduce the cost of care for people with complex health
problems, including many Medicare patients. Monitoring adoption trends and assessing
gaps in Medicare patients access to physicians with clinical IT are important as policy
makers try to speed IT adoption. A majority of Medicare fee-for-service outpatient visits
in 2001 were to physicians without significant IT support for patient care, according to a
new baseline analysis of Medicare claims data linked to the Community Tracking Study
(CTS) Physician Survey. At the same time, more vulnerable beneficiaries, including those
who were sicker, living in low-income or rural areas, or who were black, did not have significant
differences in access to physicians with clinical IT.
 
More than half of Medicare outpatient visits (57%) were to physicians in practices
that used IT for no more than one of the following five clinical functions: obtaining
treatment guidelines, exchanging clinical data with other physicians, accessing patient
notes, generating preventive treatment reminders for the physicians use, and writing
prescriptions. Access rates across individual clinical functions varied considerably.
While half of Medicare outpatient visits were to practices using IT to obtain treatment
guidelines, the proportion of visits to practices with IT support for other patient care
functions was much lower, falling to 9 percent of visits to practices with electronic prescribing
(see Table 1). Medicare beneficiaries limited access to physicians with clinical
IT mirrors the general population, since it reflects physicians slow rate of IT adoption.1 
 
   
    | Table 1Medicare Outpatient Visits to Physicians in Practices with Information 
        Technology (IT) Support for Specific Patient Care Functions in 2001, by 
        Patient Health Status1
 |   
    |  | Access Treatment Guidelines | Exchange Clinical Data with Other Physicians | Access Patient Notes | Generate Preventive Care Reminders | Electronic Prescribing |   
    | All | 49% | 33% | 30% | 23% | 9% |   
    | Healthiest Third2 | 52 | 34 | 30 | 22 | 9 |   
    | Middle Third | 78* | 33 | 30 | 23 | 9 |   
    | Sickest Third | 48* | 32* | 29 | 24* | 9 |   
    | 1 Patient health status as measured by the 
      Klabunde index of relative comorbidity. For details see endnote 2. 
 2 Reference group.
 
 * Comparison with reference group is statistically significant at p <.05.
 
 Source: Linked data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 
      2001 5 Percent Carrier File and 2001 CTS Physician Survey
 |  
 
 No Disadvantage for More Vulnerable Beneficiaries he sickest Medicare patients are likely to benefit the 
  most from seeing physicians using clinical IT because of the complexity of their 
  cases and the need for care coordination. While access to physicians using IT 
  was low for all beneficiaries, there were few differences in access between 
  sicker and healthier beneficiaries. For example, across the five clinical functions, 
  there were only small differences in the percentage of outpatient visits to 
  physicians using IT between the sickest third of Medicare patientsas measured 
  by a comorbidity index2and the healthiest third. 
  Similar results were found for outpatient visits by the frail elderly—those 
  85 and older—and by beneficiaries eligible for Medicare because of disability. 
  However, there were substantial differences for patients with end-stage renal 
  disease that vary by clinical IT function (see Supplementary 
  Table 1).
 
Some policy makers are concerned
that patients in rural areas or underserved
low-income urban areas are less likely to
have access to physicians with clinical IT
because these providers may be slower to
adopt IT. However, outpatient visits by
Medicare patients living in rural or lowincome
areas were as likely as or, in a few
instances, more likely than those in urban
or more affluent areas to be with physicians
in practices using IT (see Table 2).
And, visits by black patients were as likely
to be to physicians in practices with IT as
visits by white patients. 
 
   
    | Table 2Medicare Outpatient Visits to Physicians in Practices with Information 
        Technology (IT) Support for Specific Patient Care Functions in 2001, by 
        Patient Demographics
 |   
    |  | Access Treatment Guidelines | Exchange Clinical Data with Other Physicians | Access Patient Notes | Generate Preventive Care Reminders | Electronic Prescribing |   
    | Location of Patient Residence1 |   
    | Urban2 | 48% | 34% | 28% | 22% | 9% |   
    | Rural | 52 | 32 | 35* | 26* | 10 |   
    | Neighborhood Income in 20001 |   
    | Wealthiest Quartile2 | 47 | 33 | 26 | 23 | 9 |   
    | 3rd Quartile | 48 | 33 | 30* | 23 | 9 |   
    | 2nd Quartile | 52 | 36 | 32* | 24 | 9 |   
    | Poorest Quartile | 50 | 31 | 30* | 23 | 9 |   
    | Race |   
    | White2 | 49 | 33 | 29 | 23 | 9 |   
    | Black | 48 | 33 | 32 | 21 | 9 |   
    | Other | 48 | 34 | 31 | 27 | 10 |   
    | 1 Patient zip code of residence was used 
      to determine urban/rural location and neighborhood income. Urban refers 
      to metropolitan areas defined by the Office of Management and Budget. Income 
      data are from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 
 2 Reference group.
 
 * Comparison with reference group is statistically significant at p <.05.
 
 Source: Linked data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 
      2001 5 Percent Carrier File and 2001 CTS Physician Survey
 |  
 
 
 Policy Implications hile patient characteristics are only loosely associated 
  with the likelihood that Medicare outpatient visits will be to physicians in 
  practices using clinical IT, multivariate analysis suggests that physician characteristics 
  are far more important. In particular, practice settingespecially practice 
  sizeand, to a lesser extent, physician specialty played far more important 
  roles in predicting whether outpatient visits were to physicians with clinical 
  IT (see Supplementary Table 2). More than three-fourths 
  of Medicare outpatient visits were to physicians in practices with fewer than 
  50 physicians, the practices that are least likely to adopt clinical IT. Currently, 
  Medicare is targeting some efforts to speed IT adoption at smaller practices, 
  including technical assistance and a chronic-care payfor- performance demonstration. 
  Broader policy effortsincluding financial incentivesmay be needed, 
  however, to substantially improve patient access. Policy makers also will need 
  to monitor trends to assure that patients who can benefit most from clinical 
  IT have access to physicians using these tools.
 
 
 
 Notes
  
    | 1. | Reed, Marie C., and Joy M. Grossman, Limited 
      Information Technology for Patient Care in Physician Offices, Issue 
      Brief No. 89, Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, D.C. 
      (September 2004). |  
    | 2. | Comorbidity is a measure of the relative number and severity of health 
      conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, that may cause or aggravate 
      other conditions. The Klabunde relative comorbidity index was calculated 
      from all claims in the 2001 5 Percent Carrier File. See Klabunde, Carrie 
      N., et al., Development of a Comorbidity Index Using Physician Claims Data, 
      Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 53, No. 12, (December 2000). |  
 
 
 Supplemental TablesSupplemental Table 1 - Medicare Outpatient 
  Visits to Physicians in Practices with IT Support for Specific Patient Care 
  Functions in 2001, by Patient Age and Medicare Eligibility
 Supplemental Table 2 - Adjusted Odds Ratios 
  for Likelihood of Medicare Outpatient Visits to Physicians in Practices with 
  IT to Support Specific Patient Care Functions in 2001
 |