Center for Studying Health System Change

Providing Insights that Contribute to Better Health Policy

Advanced Search Instructions

You can refine your search with the following modifiers:

* Use an to perform a wildcard search.Example: prescript* would return "prescription", "prescriptions" etc.
"" Use quotes to match a phrase.Example: "prescription drug" only returns results where the words are next to each other.
+ Use a plus sign to perform a search where the additional term MUST be part of the page.Example: prescription +drug
- Use a minus sign to perform a search where the additional term SHOULD NOT be part of the page.Example: prescription -drug
< > Use a < > sign to perform a search where the additional term should be of greater or lesser importance in the search.Example: prescription >drug
Find pages with the word precription with additional importance for the word drug.
( ) Use parentheses to group different search terms together.Example: prescription (+medicare -drug)
 

Insurance Coverage & Costs Access to Care Quality & Care Delivery Health Care Markets Employers/Consumers Health Plans Hospitals Physicians Issue Briefs Data Bulletins Research Briefs Policy Analyses Community Reports Journal Articles Other Publications Surveys Site Visits Design and Methods Data Files


The Paradoxical Politics of Provider Reempowerment

December 2004
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 29, No. 6 (December 2004)
Lawrence D. Brown, Elizabeth Eagan

The recent decline, indeed perhaps dismantling, of managed care is sometimes
treated as both consequence and cause of the political reempowerment of medical
providers, whose professional dominance managed care had challenged. Drawing
evidence from Round III of the Community Tracking Study of the Center for Studying
Health System Change, this article reviews the politics of four “arenas” of managed
care regulation—prompt payment, mandated benefits, external appeals, and
financial solvency—and concludes that the power of providers is contingent on patterns
of coalition and conflict that differ across the discrete arenas. The zero-sum connotations
of the “de” and “re” empowerment of providers under managed care fail to
capture the subtlety of providers’ search for fresh cultural, economic, and political
resources in shifting policy contexts.

For a full copy of this article please visit the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law Web site. (Subscription required.)

 

Back to Top