Dec. 14, 2005
FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Alwyn Cassil (202) 264-3484 or firstname.lastname@example.org
"While theres been plenty of buzz about pay for performance as a way to improve health care quality, the reality is that these initiatives are off to a slow start in many communities," said Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D., president of HSC, a nonpartisan policy research organization funded principally by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Noting that Congress is considering physician pay-for-performance initiatives in Medicare, Ginsburg added, "There isnt yet a lot of private-sector experience for Medicare to build on, but if Medicare does move forward with broad pay-for-performance requirements, it could serve as a powerful catalyst to jumpstart P4P activities."
The studys findings are detailed in a new HSC Issue BriefCan Money Buy Quality? Physician Response to Pay for Performanceavailable online here. The study is based on HSCs 2005 site visits to 12 nationally representative communities: Boston; Cleveland; Greenville, S.C.; Indianapolis; Lansing, Mich.; Little Rock, Ark.; Miami; northern New Jersey; Orange County, Calif.; Phoenix; Seattle; and Syracuse, N.Y.
Of the 12 communities tracked by HSC for the last 10 years, only twoOrange County and Bostonhave significant physician pay-for-performance programs. In the other communities, where almost no physicians have received quality-related payments to date, physician attitudes about P4P range from skeptical to hostile, the study found.
"Orange County and Boston are out front in part because physicians in both communities are organized in large medical groups, health systems or independent practice associations that have the resources to manage care systematically and track physician performance," said HSC Senior Consulting Researcher Thomas Bodenheimer, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco, and coauthor of the study with HSC Health Research Analyst Jessica H. May; HSC Senior Consulting Researcher Robert Berenson, M.D., of The Urban Institute; and HSC Consulting Research Assistant Jennifer Coughlan of Mathematica Policy Research.
"P4P may be difficult to implement in markets like Miami that are dominated by small physician practices, and about one out of three U.S. physicians still practice solo or in a two-physician group," Bodenheimer said.
Other key findings of the study include:
The Center for Studying Health System Change is a nonpartisan policy research organization committed to providing objective and timely research on the nations changing health system to help inform policy makers and contribute to better health care policy. HSC, based in Washington, D.C., is funded principally by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and is affiliated with Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.