Center for Studying Health System Change

Providing Insights that Contribute to Better Health Policy

Advanced Search Instructions

You can refine your search with the following modifiers:

* Use an to perform a wildcard search.Example: prescript* would return "prescription", "prescriptions" etc.
"" Use quotes to match a phrase.Example: "prescription drug" only returns results where the words are next to each other.
+ Use a plus sign to perform a search where the additional term MUST be part of the page.Example: prescription +drug
- Use a minus sign to perform a search where the additional term SHOULD NOT be part of the page.Example: prescription -drug
< > Use a < > sign to perform a search where the additional term should be of greater or lesser importance in the search.Example: prescription >drug
Find pages with the word precription with additional importance for the word drug.
( ) Use parentheses to group different search terms together.Example: prescription (+medicare -drug)
 

Sign up for HSC Alerts!

Insurance Coverage & Costs Access to Care Quality & Care Delivery Health Care Markets Issue Briefs Data Bulletins Research Briefs Tracking Reports Policy Analyses Community Reports Journal Articles Other Publications Surveys Site Visits HSCdataOnline Design and Methods Data Files Sign Up for HSC Alerts News Media Sign Up Email This Document

Printable Version HSC Annual Report

HSC Revamps Its Web Site

A Window on HSC Research

SC has reorganized its web site by six topical areas to make its growing number of analyses more accessible. The site (www.hschange.org) allows users to select from three different perspectives-policy maker, researcher or journalist-and to access bundles of related publications or those related to a relevant policy issue. The site also has a robust search function so that users can find information quickly on any topic.

Visitors to the site can choose to receive e-mail alerts about new analyses in topic areas of interest and can forward those analyses to colleagues.

The following sections below provide a window into the new site through the six topical areas.


Managed Care

Health Services Research
Vol. 35, No. 1, Part I, April 2000

MEDICAID MANAGED CARE

by Joy M. Grossman

Managed Carelthough the competitive threat from national plans is pervasive in 12 communities studied as part of the Community Tracking Study, local plans in most sites continue to retain strong, often dominant positions in historically concentrated markets. According to an analysis by HSC, three strategies to increase market share and market power were used in all sites in response to purchaser pressures for stable premiums and provider choice and the threat of entry of plans: (1) consolidation/geographic expansion; (2) price competition; and (3) product line/segment diversification that focuses on broad networks and open-access products. In most markets, in response to the demand for provider choice, the trend is away from ownership and exclusive arrangements with providers. Although local plans are moving to become full-service regional players, there is uncertainty about the ability of all plans to sustain growth strategies at the expense of margins and organizational stability, and to effectively manage care with broad networks.


This article is based on site visits conducted in 1996 and 1997.



Insurance Coverage

Issue Brief
No. 27, February 2000

WHO HAS A CHOICE OF HEALTH PLANS?

by Sally Trude

Insurance Coverageolicy makers are concerned that consumers have no voice in the changing health care system. They debate, however, whether the consumers' voice should be heard through regulation or the marketplace. For market forces to work in the consumers' interest, consumers must have a choice of plans. New survey data from HSC suggest that more consumers have a choice of plans than is generally believed, and that the proportion of consumers who have plan choice is increasing. According to HSC's 1998-1999 Household Survey, 64 percent of families have a choice of health plans-two percentage points higher than two years ago. This Issue Brief reports on these and other findings from HSC on consumer choice.

This Issue Brief is based on Household Surveys conducted in 1996-1997 and 1998-1999 and the 1997 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Employer Health Insurance Survey.



Cost

Issue Brief
No. 23, November 1999

TRACKING HEALTH CARE COSTS: LONG-PREDICTED UPTURN APPEARS

by Paul B. Ginsburg

Costfter three years of anticipation, health care cost trends have taken an upward turn. In employment-based insurance, premium increases for 1999 were in the 5 percent range, up from 3 percent for 1998. The rate of increase in underlying costs of private insurance-lagged by one year-also rose by approximately two percentage points. Many had expected a sharper upturn in premium increases than in underlying cost increases. This would have heralded a turn in the insurance underwriting cycle, which has not yet occurred. This Issue Brief tracks trends in the rate of growth of health care costs and the experience with premiums for employment-based health insurance and discusses the impact of these trends on consumers.

This Issue Brief is based on data from the 1999 Kaiser Family Foundation/Hospital Research and Educational Trust Survey of Employer-Based Health Plans, the Milliman & Robertson Health Cost Index, the Hay Benefits Report, the Department of Labor's Consumer Expenditure Survey and Bureau of Labor Statistics.



Access & Quality

Health Services Research
Vol. 35, No. 1, Part II, April 2000

DOES TYPE OF HEALTH INSURANCE AFFECT HEALTH CARE USE AND ASSESSMENTS AMONG THE PRIVATELY INSURED?

by James D. Reschovsky, Peter Kemper and Ha T. Tu

Access and Qualityhe type of insurance people have-not just whether it is managed care but the type of managed care-affects their use of services and their assessments of the care they receive. Based on the Community Tracking Study Insurance Followback Survey, a supplement to the Household Survey, HSC researchers found that as people move from indemnity insurance to more managed care products, use of primary care increases modestly, but use of specialists is reduced. Few differences were found in preventive care, hospital use and surgeries. The likelihood of having unmet or delayed care does not vary by insurance type, but enrollees in more managed products are less likely to cite financial barriers and are more likely to perceive problems in provider access, convenience and organizational factors. Consumer assessments of care-including satisfaction with care and trust in physicians-are generally lower under more managed products, particularly closed-model health maintenance organizations (HMOs).

This article is based on the Community Tracking Study Household Survey conducted in 1996-1997 and the Insurance Followback Survey.



The Uninsured & The Poor

Issue Brief
No. 22, October 1999

WHO DECLINES EMPLOYER-SPONSORED HEALTH INSURANCE AND REMAINS UNINSURED?

by Peter J. Cunningham, Elizabeth Schaefer and Christopher Hogan

The Uninsured and The Poorwenty percent of all uninsured persons are offered health insurance by their employer or a family member's employer, but choose not to enroll in the offered plan(s). Most persons who do not "take up" or enroll in available employer-sponsored coverage cite cost as the main reason. This Issue Brief, based on two surveys conducted as part of the HSC Community Tracking Study, presents new findings on who declines employer-sponsored coverage and is uninsured as a result. Given the importance of cost in an individual's decision whether to enroll in employer-sponsored coverage, policy makers need to consider ways to address the problem identified by this study: low take-up rates among lower- income workers.

This Issue Brief is based on the Household Survey conducted in 1996-1997 and the 1997 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Employer Health Insurance Survey.



Communities & Market Trends

Issue Brief
No. 26, January 2000

INSOLVENCY AND CHALLENGES OF REGULATING PROVIDERS THAT BEAR RISK

by Linda R. Brewster, Leslie A. Jackson and Cara S. Lesser

Communities and Market Trendsisk contracting and capitation are two widely used financial mechanisms that give incentives to health care providers to control costs. Risk-bearing arrangements have failed in a number of communities, however. This has shaken local markets, disrupting consumers' access to health care services and triggering losses for physicians and hospitals. It also has raised questions about the adequacy of related regulatory oversight, which holds important implications for local and national policy makers. This Issue Brief examines failed risk-contracting arrangements in two of the 12 communities that HSC tracks intensively-Northern New Jersey and Orange County, Calif.-and describes how state policy makers have responded to protect consumer and provider interests.

This Issue Brief is based on information obtained in site visits conducted in 1998 and 1999.


Table Of Contents | Previous Section | Next Section

 

Back to Top
 
Site Last Updated: 2/10/2012             Privacy Policy
Center for Studying Health System Change
1100 1st Street, NE, 12th Floor
Washington, DC 20002-4221
tel: 202.484.5261
fax: 202.863.1763
hscinfo@hschange.org